I've reread
Gil,
Sally and
Kath's Day, but I'm afraid it was of little assistance.
Sally was very confusing and seemed to be somewhat confused too. Normally, behaviour like her current one would make me think her innocent, but with
Sally, it's just typical. Also, those pairings of hers were definitely strange - for example, what's the point of pairing me and
McCaber up if there's nothing that suggests we're wolves together? - but again, with anyone else, I'd say it's wolvish, but with
Sally, I just can't tell. I can't read her at all.
Kath? Something in her chattery way is slightly wolvish, but there's nothing in her posts that would actually indicate to her being one. She is one of those persons who should be watched closely through the game at even it doesn't always help. I very often suspect
Kath from early on and now that once-so-familiar feeling is not there. I wonder if it means anything.
Gil... well obviously no data. Unlike so many here, I don't really see why a non-participator couldn't be a wolf. But the fact that it's possible doesn't make it true or even probable.
So I guess I'm as undecided as I was before looking back to that trial day.
I'd love to take a closer look at
Zali and
Valier, I hope I will have time to do it. (I'll be away for a few hours now.)
I will almost 100% certainly vote
Nogrod toDay though, as it seems to be the most logical cause. He is the only one whose guilt I can be certain of.
edit: xed with Brinn