I'm back and will be around until the deadline; although I have some work to do, it can all be completed at or near my computer, and I'll check this thread frequently.
Greenie's comment about
Nogrod voting for good players was odd, although I don't think it was wolfishly so (or innocently so either, for that matter). Certainly,
Nogrod has a habit of arguing against lynching the experienced and active players, something
Greenie may not have been aware of - then again, he doesn't always practice what he preaches on that matter either,
, and the argument that loud wolves are more easily caught is, after all, behind the notorious "lynch-the-quiet" theory. One *could* argue that, while he advises otherwise,
Nogrod tends to go after the most active players - regardless,
Greenie making a comment, true or false, about her expecations of
Noggie's playing style is not something I find suspicious (actually, I'm beginning to wonder why
Izzy found it worth bringing up).
I'm also curious,
Izzy, as to why you find
Valier more wolfish than
Legate, as the reasons you give don't clearly show that. I think she is too, as I said, but not for quite the same reasons. In fact, your reasons, in themselves, don't really support any conclusion - you seem to find all three suspicious. I agree,
Legate's remark looks controlling and vaguely threatening, but actually this makes me feel better about him. Such behavior is better for finding wolves than covering their tracks... it seems to me that the first to balk at interrogation are those who are up to no good (note: this doesn't mean I think people should be interrogated and intimidated - outside WW - of course! But all's fair in love and Werewolf.)
I'm going to be blunt here and say that my suspicion-meter is tipping slightly in
Izzy's direction at the moment.