Quote:
Originally Posted by Nogrod
Btw. my concerns with Lommy just hit the roof seeing her latest post where she looked really amicable indeed . . .
|
Eh. First I'm a wolf because I'm so "aggressive" and then because I'm so "amicable". I smell a contradiction here.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Nogrod
. . . even underlining that she had voiced the same concerns I did but more pleasantly.
|
So what is the probelm?
a) The fact that I pointed out that you were not the only one here to say that you'd vote
Miggy if he doesn't appear?
b) Or that I said so in the first place?
c) Or the fact that I did it in a less aggressive way than you did?
d) Or that I said that I did it less aggressively than you did?
Well, obviously
a) Why wouldn't I point that out?
Miggy might be a wolf trying to justify his planned vote against you on rather feeble grounds. And even if you are the wolf out of the two, well, even wolves don't deserve to be suspected/voted on false grounds.
b) I think I've said it already why I'd rather vote
TM than you if I have no clear opinion about either of you.
c) I think my way of saying things, in ww at least, is generally less aggressive and more friendly than yours. Besides, I must say that while you threatened to vote
TM to get him talking, I never did. That itself should be areason to call my approach less aggressive.
d) Well, I was just trying to joke a little bit like the smilie tells and I also saw my being more friendly and the fact that I stated the will-vote-
Might -thing later than yours as reasons that
TM might have had for picking on your comment but saying nothing about mine. (So, if you will, you can ever read it the way that I'm making up bad excuses for
TM to behave how he did.
)