I would agree with
Lommy that
Roa is acting in a strangely consiliatory way. And to top that it's interesting that while she discusses the importance of this Day she does little else but talks about general issues. Well, I've myself done pretty much the same this far so maybe I can't blame her on that. On the other hand I do agree with most if not all of what she says about the general issues and that adds to my feel good -factor with her.
In my view - at this point - I'd say that I'm not at all relaxed with her but she speaks sense as always, also when she's a baddie.
Legate is another person around here who has posted more and with whom I have some concerns. It seemed that he was under the very same and faulty impression as I was that those trios
Volo posted on the discussion thread would be the actual trios. Looking at his first post from that point of view brings
Mac's first post from the last game to my mind very vividly. There
Mac was a wolf who didn't know who I am and tried to frame me from the beginning making outrageously fabricated zero-suspicions the whole content of his post. I realised he was a wolf from that. Funnily I was to be a lynched wolf of a competing team so nobody believed me in the beginning...
But there is something strikingly similar in
Legate's post even if it's more subtile. Mainly I'm worried about the way he could be seen laying groundwork for his possible vote on me in the trial to come (which we both then thought we were facing each other in).
Legate is a reasonable player and when he is playing for the good of the village he's the most considerate person who avoids suspicions without a cause. But for some reason he decided to open the trial game already there in his first post of Day0.0. Why would that be if not to secure his stance on the trial-Day? And why would he feel the need to secure that position? Well a wolf might need it if he were to try and win a trophy...
Yet again after that he has played most wisely and made a few good points. Also I like his way of playing because he actually posts and brings forwards new ideas.
I might consider voting
Legate or
Roa toDay on these grounds.
*Diplomacy check: fumble, red alert!*
But I do hope I will find better candidates because both of them would be real assets to us if they are innocents and fighting wars between us as innocents would only play to the hands of the wolves. If we had an actual lynch toDay I'd rather vote for someone not committed to the game though... the loudmouths tend to get caught as the game proggresses as the net of lies they have to weave breaks sooner or later.
*Diplomacy check: not good but getting an inch better*
We need to speak our minds here now and toDay even if it means voicing concerns about people we like to play with.
*Diplomacy check: lost the die*
(The end of copying Legate's style)
~*~
Lommy I think has been helpful and straightforward and she also has the "right opinions".
My only problem with that is that if someone can totally fool me it's
Lommy. So I'm torn between feeling good about her and thinking whether I should suspect her even more because of this good feeling...
I'll take a break and come back with something to say about those people who have said less...