All right, people, I'm back and I hope to give some time to sorting my thoughts out during the rest of toDay.
First, a response:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by TM
And to Legate, this has something to do with the fact that I have vacation now and thus a lot more time on my hands. So instead of learning for some test I can think a bit more rather then just post quickly.
|
Good to hear that, if there is really nothing more behind it, then it's okay. Yet I must say one thing that troubles me,
TM - if you have so much time on your hands, why do your posts stay mostly on jumping between three or four people and nothing to say on others? It looks like programmedly turning around several suspects.
But, let's move now on to other things.
I was somewhat doubtful about
Mac's theory about
Aganzir, nevertheless, his arguments as summed up in one of his last posts sound quite convincing. I, for one, am the last person to base my suspicions on what someone else says. However, after re-reading
Agan's posts, I am getting the bad feeling that maybe this clever
Agan-wolf came among us once again. But I thought also about her voting: on Day 1 she voted
Nog, as we all know. On Day 2, she voted for
Mac - and that was absolutely throwaway vote at that time. I thought that maybe, had she been a wolf, after the 1st-Day fall of her packmate, she decided to back up a little and hide out of sight, while (eventually) building up a case against
Mac for further use. I could also add that this move will also serve well if
Mac is a wolf - a safe vote for a fellow wolf (as opposite to unsafe-going vote on Day 1). Of course I don't want to overcombinate things, yet this is also a possibility (though I am inclined to belive
Mac innocent right now).
Concerning the other players. I must say it is quite hard for me to make my mind about the "high-class" vocal players, as there's too many of them: including dead
Nogrod, with
SpM and
Boro and
Mac and
morm and
Farael this makes almost half of the village. It would be quite improbable that a wolf wouldn't be among them (although if he weren't, the worse for us). But I must say these are very dangerous waters for me, as the discussions are tangled and it is hard to spot anything. Who intrigues me the most currently is
SpM. YesterDay, he supported the suspicions on
Valier short after it was voiced, which could be this "voice of Saruman"-tactics without actually voting himself, and when the bandwaggon was rolling, he conviniently jumped in. On the other hand, his vote for
Nog on Day 1 was the second one, which on the other hand would speak for his innocence.
SpM is clearly not a stupid player and he could have retracted still. What I want to say, mainly: whatever the case, we should not forget
SpM (I originally mistyped and wrote RPG
), because if
Nog's death was orchestrated, this could serve him well.
I am probably going to do a larger analysis of some of these people, if I have the chance, yet this could also mean spending several hours by this (given the length of their posts). Whatever, I will start with
SpM and will see.
One word about
Nerwen. She looked innocent to me at the beginning, but given her votes and discussions with people, like with
Valier and
Kath yesterDay she starts to seem more and more suspicious. Yet I would like to say - don't be too hasty, hum hom, because it is also possible that an innocent under pressure (as
Nerwen surely is) may start to behave suspiciously. So, I would advise being careful.
Also let me say
Rikae's vote yesterDay made me a little wary of her. I don't have any strong suspicion about her, yet she convinently joined the
Valier bandwagon at the crucial point and the way she voted, during her quick appearance, moved her to the orange zone for me.
Okay, so I guess that's the main things I had in mind now, will be back later hopefully with some conclusions.