WCW - earlier you were trying to explain to me about copyright law and how some of my beliefs were in error. And I guess some were. Thank you for that correction. The one thing that I still have a question about is on page 1 you said there is no difference in penalties or protections between a formal registered copyright and the one you said takes effect upon creation.
STW - There is a huge legal difference between a copyright and a legally registered copyright which attaches protections of law and introduces certain legal remedies and penalties. Huge difference.
WCH - No. There isn't. None. The only difference registration makes is that it's much easier to prove that the work in question existed as of that date. Period.
Then Nerwen provided a link with the copyright people which said this
Quote:
Why should I register my work if copyright protection is automatic?
Registration is recommended for a number of reasons. Many choose to register their works because they wish to have the facts of their copyright on the public record and have a certificate of registration. Registered works may be eligible for statutory damages and attorney's fees in successful litigation. Finally, if registration occurs within five years of publication, it is considered prima facie evidence in a court of law.
|
Now that clearly mentions several advantages including eligibility for statuatory damages, repayment of attorneys fees, and the ability to use it as prima facie evidence in court. Those would seem to be some very big differences that could potentially mean a good deal more money. Would you agree?