Interesting thoughts
Nerwen. Sadly I donīt have time or energy to go deep in to them but Iīm feeling quite good about your contributions right now.
And I do agree with you wholeheartedly. We really should remember that practically no one
TM spoke about we canīt be sure about.
Itīs also interesting to consider the choices of the balrogs:
Volo, The Might, Gil-Galad. And look at the accuracy! A cobbler, the seer, the hunter...
Iīd say thatīs not too bad!
Itīs also interesting to see fex. both myself and
Legate still alive, untouched by those creatures of fire and flame. So have they been afraid of the ranger or is
Legate the remaining one?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Nerwen
They can't both be balrogs.
Are they the lovers?
Edit: Don't assume that, if so, one of them's a balrog. I'm not sure how the love-triangle-whatever-thing works.
|
Allright. Maybe we should then speak openly about our beliefs about
Legate and
Kath - and anyhow
Nerwen brought it to the fore already so itīs not hidden anymore.
I thought that already yesterDay. But as I was afraid that the lover-triangle would have been the cobbler - the hunter - an ordo* I was afraid to speak it out (thinking
Legate as the hunter then) as there were chances the balrogs hadnīt noticed their seeming alliance.
The dilemma number 1 now is whether we should think the other part of the duo to be a balrog or not. According to that belief we should then either try to protect them or lynch them...
Dilemma no. 2 is for the ranger to make the decision conserning #1 if theyīre still alive in a situation where Iīm probably also alive.
With only one balrog left the balrog knows exactly what the situation is.
The fundamental dilemma surely goes: do we have a correct interpretation here about
The Legate and
Kath as lovers. We can be wrong about it as well.
*That would have been quite balanced as both the cobbler and the hunter are double-edged creatures able of doing good and harm to the side they represent.