Now let's see the way this agitator works his foul ways!
Yes, I do admit there is a deep ideological divide between my reasonable persona and this
Macalaure-fellow here, but there is something more unnerving as well. It looks like my predictions are coming true.
Look at the unashamed plea for the masses! "Let's pick the ideological adversary and feel good together... so that we baddies can stab you rest dead while you're asleep".
Listen to me you hippies and commies! You may have the numbers of the crowd but I have the Right and Justice in my view. I will not be threatened by these self-made agitators. And I do advice you others to start think with your own good ol' conservative minds inherited from your ancestors.
Just check this student activist and the way he enters the discussion.
His points are based purely on ideological matters - and there's nothing bad in that in itself, what else can we do with this few persons taking part in the discussion?
But all of his post is just a build up for what he wishes to accomplish. He wishes to get rid of someone who could stand as a voice of reason and family values around here. All that stuff is meant to twist your minds to make your choises toDay along the partylines, not based on any actual suspicions. That's the communist propaganda in it's purest form!
Look especially at the last point:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Mac the foul agitator
*Macalaure keeps on chanting, ignoring the obvious lack of broad approval*
|
The underlined portion tells it all. Why to say something like that if not trying to underline your claimed - not real - innocense? He tries to make a claim and to further the discussion why you should lynch the people differing from you on ideological standpoints (which in this village might suit him and his fellows just fine) but simultaneously distracts himself from it via this subterfuge. After this - if he succeeds and I'm lynched - he can claim that he never had the idea of actually suspecting me or believing that his "modest" contribution would make any difference...
Just look at it yourselves. And if you happen to make the bad choice, look at what I said after that.
Okay. I'm off to sleep now and will be very busy when I wake up. I will be back at the last hour - I try to sneak in before that but I'm not sure I can - and wish to see a lot of contributions before it (and I do hope I have time to read them through as well before I need to vote).
Just as a very early summary.
Macalaure's way of entering the Day made all my alarm-bells ring. I'm also a bit worried about
Lommy, but her words may be those of an innocent Lommy as well.
With
Brinn I just have bad vibes even if there's nothing to pin it down with. Somehow it's the way how she so casually hides behind the ideology (role). The same might be said of
Shasta and
Menel, I admit, but somehow.
(Add:
Shasta's last post is just a way too conciliatory -
if Lommy is innocent.)
Anyhow. For the sake of a fair game I'd be ready to vote also for someone who hides in the shadows on this Day1 - if there be such persons as the Day draws near the end and if there are no better cases to be made. This sure is an early speculation but as I will be able to come back only late toDay I thought I'd need to make that clear as well.