OK, my vote for SPaM - no incredible stroke of genius behind it, just the fact that, to me, the interaction between he and Lommy looked as though it had to contain at least one wolf. Both were too quick on the trigger in response to each other; it smacked of a wolvish attempt at...
a diversion. As for Lommy, I became concerned that she might be more likely gifted, so I voted for my other suspect. I have to admit, I completely failed to see Nogrod's suspiciousness. Wie peinlich...
Today I've combed through Nogrod's posts for any sign of who the other wolf/wolves might be, but I fear he's too crafty for it to be much use.
Still - he seems to have attempted to scapegoat Izzy in a way that, perhaps, he wouldn't if she was a fellow wolf - there would be too much chance that it would work. He waffles on Dury, Brinn and Kath in a very homogenous fashion; a tried and true technique for hiding a fellow wolf. Kath's vote speaks for her innocence; of Dury he says:
Quote:
Basic Day1 Dury-banter, makes joking suspicions and later answers to Isabell with a joke-analysis on Isabell (and not the prologue she was asked by Isabell if I got it right).
So?
She can be anything. I see nothing out of the ordinary here but she is very much able to use that as a cover as well.
|
This is odd - Dury's first post actually struck me as somewhat atypical. The conclusion amounts to hedging one's bets - that's all...
On Brinn:
Quote:
Seems to be like she normally is as well, considerate and cool. Although one might say that she seems to prefer talking more about general issues than people around.
So?
Hard to say once again. She might be a baddie playing it safe for she sure could pull that presentation...
|
This looks slightly more like a wolf-hiding strategy to me that the Dury quote. "She might be a baddie" looks like suspicion without actually being suspicion; it's nothing but waffling like the Dury-waffle, but worded in such a way to make it LOOK stronger, and maybe create some distance between the wolves...
I'm also by no means reassured of SPaM's innocence toDay. I'd like to point out that his argument that "an innocent would do the same" is no argument at all; and his behavior up to the point of changing his vote could certainly be oonstrued as an attempt to save Nogrod.