This one about
Kath still and then I think I try to get down to looking at other things for a change.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Rikae
About Kath...having been a wolf with her before, I'm beginning to think she's a bit too active to be evil now. In that game she posted enough to seem helpful, but nothing of this kind of volume. Of course, she's certainly smart enough to change her style for just that reason, and the tense feeling pervades even her lengthy posts.
|
Funny that you mentioned this as my eyes just caught this one from Kath's last mammouth-analysis:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Kath on Aganzir
Had Menel down as innocent but with it being so early in the game those without extra knowledge couldn't have known he was a wolf. But then, she got xyzzy and Rune down as innocents correctly too. Chance or something more?
|
Now what is this??? I might understand an innocent newbie saying something like this and then learn from it for the next time. I mean this is just impossible with
Kath...
For those not experienced enough the following: Rule #6 for innocents - If you think you find someone acting or behaving like a gifted shut your mouth and do not share it openly to the baddies to notice (it's possible they have not noticed it).
And anyhow. Being right with two persons innocence in a village were there are something like 16 innocents and 4 baddies (or something not very far from that ratio) it's not an actual feat to name two innocents...
Now who does this kinds of things? The cobbler obviously does them. So could it be
Kath is a cobbler after all? So we have a cobbler in this village as well?
I do agree with
Rikae that
Kath is experienced enough to change her style when the previous one looks dangerous to her. And I also think that there was some pressure gathering over her because of her normal "be intelligent but under-radar" -tactics in this particular game and thence she changed... into this sisyfosian errand of making a page-by-bage full analysis of the whole game.
