Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Macalaure
Why this sudden fit of defensiveness, Rune?
There is nothing wrong with in-character-ness. You might have noticed that I left Ang and Diamond out of my list. That's because they mixed their in-character fun with actual points. And of course there's also nothing wrong with pure in-character stuff. All you have to do is deal with my suspicion then.  |
Defensiveness? I would rather call it anger . . .
Actually it was a matter of me thinking you chritisism was unfair. It is alright to think there is too much in charachter stuff going on, but I thought your point about the rules was weird. . .
It kind of seemed like a way to stir things up and whether that is with good or bad intentions I cannot say.
The post seemed like a good way to
1. get some talking going
2. get my views said
3. meet your demands on less in charachter posting
