View Single Post
Old 04-28-2007, 08:34 AM   #303
Roa_Aoife
Ghost Prince of Cardolan
 
Roa_Aoife's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Someday, I'll rule all of it.
Posts: 1,696
Roa_Aoife is a guest of Tom Bombadil.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spm
I refer the honourable lady to my post #218 and to the post referred to therein.
I assume what you refer to (which you never deigned to quote) is post #34, in which Rikae is almost enitrely in character, both when she accuses Mac and when she accuses you. The only not in-character thing she says is to agree with you about your plan. You, my dear, Saucey, read it mistakenly. (Similar to how you misread Volo's joke about Nogrod, Lommy, and Aganzir being the Vampires.) Or else you are intentionally spreading misinformation. I do not fail to note that you direct us to your post on the matter, and not the actual post in question. Very sneaky of you.

Quote:
Roa, I agree with much of what you have said, but why do you feel so confident (as it appears) about Rikae?
I'm not at all confident of Rikae. Especially not after display post Eomer's trap. However, I will not simply oblige a mistaken case just because I also suspect a person. Only people who aren't thinking of the good of the village do that. If we are to find wolves, we must be objective. That includes discarding inaccurate points about someone we find suspicious.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nogrod
You propose that we should be assured that argumernts can win the game so give us one then and do not hide behind far-fetched suppositions and speculative ideas! Quit making these "a vampire might have done this" things and give some evidence you're so happy to rely on at the level of rhetorics. You play only on the level of rhertoric and have nothing solid to go for - even though you call for optimism about the solid things we have... Cut the crap, please. And don't fool us any more.
Touchy, aren't we? My case, as you either intentionally or mistakenly misread, is not a "A vampire might have done this" case. It's a "You blatanly lied about someone and then tried to cover it up. This makes you suspicious," case. My case is not built on Far-fecthed suppositions, but on hard fact: what happened, and then what you said about what happened. I used almost entirely your quotes for it. No speculation necessary. I have pretty solid evidence in everything you've said. So you cut the crap and admit that you've been acting strangely- if you hadn't denied it so vehemently, I would have let it go.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rikae
I am the seer.
*sigh* I was supecting you were a gifted of some kind. I told you guys you didn't have a good case aginst her.


I don't have time to finish reading.

Rikae, dream for who you want (I'm a little surprised thar one us three was not your first choice) but I wouldn't mind getting dreamed- it'd be nice to shut Nogrod up about how I'm clearly evil because I dared to suspect him.

As for me, I will vote Nogrod. He just keeps looking worse- jumpy, over defensive, retaliatory, and just plain mean at some points. PLus despite finding me so clearly evil, he doesn't have me on his possible vote list.


Sorry about the lack of posting- I will explain on the Admin thread.
__________________
We can't all be Roas when it comes to analysing... -Lommy

I didn't say you're evil, Roa, I said you're exasperating. -Nerwen
Roa_Aoife is offline   Reply With Quote