[Macalaure]

Originally Posted by Nogrod

Oh my Mac! I'm simply distrusting your deductions and your story sounds just too false!

This isn't a really pressing point, but I thought I should address it anyway.

I didn't want to play the common dreams-of-his-top-suspect seer. Instead, I wanted to dream of people whose roles will throw some light on other people regardless whether they come out good or evil. Lommy's role also gave some light to Legate and tgwbs (I suspect tgwbs really thought Lommy innocent; and I do not forget that I could be wrong about Legate), and Roa's gave some to Nogrod (though it turns out she and I were wrong now).
So my plans didn't really work out, except that I was lucky about Lommy, who might have slipped under the radar otherwise.

Originally Posted by Roa

Strange timing, Mac, but I must say, don't worry, the ranger will protect you tonight. Tomorrow we'll find out if you're lying.

So we do have a ranger, and not two hunters or something. Good. I hope s/he gambled, though.

Concerning the timing, well, I only felt the need to reveal after Nogrod wrote this:

Originally Posted by Nogrod

I was afraid that Mac's sudden changes of view were because he was the seer. But now I see he changes his course mainly in the middle of the Day.
...
It's kind of revealing that in his first post on Day2 he thinks I'm somewhat clear and after that he changes totally and starts slowly increasing the pressure with me during the same Day (alongside Roa, I must add). So no seer he is.

His sudden insistance that I'm not the seer (coming from my top undreamt-of suspect!), had my alarms on. I thought he was trying to direct the ranger the wrong way, so he wouldn't have to worry about him/her when he kills me in the night. I thought that maybe he thought I had dreamt of him and therefore he didn't fear suspicion. Had I tried to give a hint to the ranger myself, it would have had the same effect as to reveal my role, just without letting you know of my knowledge.

Well, anyway. Since it seems like many have thought me to be the seer, the wolves probably have, too. So it's not as desastrous as it seems.

Oh, and of course I didn't alter my suspicions from the first post on the day on. That would have made me look seerish.



Nogrod and Mith are almost known innocents, now. But we should be careful, because they could be the lover (if lovers exists) of the last wolf, and Mith could have been a Mytho. The two aren't proven innocent.
This leaves Six, xyzzy, Legate and Rikae. Rikae looks suspicious indeed. Everybody should have a look at the posts of Lommy and Roa, though I already did that all the time the last two days. Sadly, I will probably be short on time toDay, but I'll try what I can.