The Barrow-Downs Discussion Forum - View Single Post

Macalaure · 04-10-2007, 01:42 PM

Gil-Galad

#5 nothing

#31
Makes a good point about Lommy (a redundant statement from her)
Ties Lommy with Roa because of Lommy's defense of her (tied in good or evil)
I see his point on Lommy, though tying her with Roa is a stretch, I think. The comment on giftedness could be a slip - or not.

#38
Needs to vote: Lommy

#62
Returns to say if Lommy's a wolf then Roa and Six might be, too, or they're just confused and if she's innocent the other two also look that way.
This is a very vague statement, to be polite. But it's "If A is innocent, then B probably is, too" and not the trademark wolvish "If A is innocent, then B probably isn't"

----

#120 - his longest post ever
In the first part, he makes some fair points analysing the votes
Then it's not too clear to me how he comes from this to his suspect classification
His point on Six is bogus

What do you do with this. it starts really good and ends desastrous. However, I'm not sure whether it has been written with evil intent.

#122
He attacks Roa because she didn't like his point about Six. This really does look bad

#150
He still sees a connection between Roa and Lommy
tgwbs seems innocent to him (if no co-wolf is in danger, then a wolf might want to save a villager who causes distraction, or use him to get a defendable vote. But then, Gil usually isn't too eager about defendable votes. I (innocent) thought tgwbs innocent, too, at that time)
Votes Mith with reasons I don't share, but which I can understand somewhat

#156
He defends himself from Roa, quite offensely
Roa's accuse isn't that good in the first place, and though Gil's defense looks very weird, it seems genuine to me

#210
Says the votes are too spread and if tgwbs is a wolf, we will have to use ww-math

Huh?

----

#221 nothing

#233
Still suspicious of Mith. His reasons for it make no sense to me whatsoever

#254
He defends himself from Sixth, with fair points
Votes Mith because she bugs him
Will look at Roa and me if he survives (I'm not sure why he thinks he might be killed)

What can I say. Usually, this would have been enough to make me suspicious, but one has to use different measures when it comes to Gil (no offense

). There are some suspicious things, but also a lot which is very typical for Gil. He remains watchworthy for me, but isn't one of my, now two, top suspects.

PS: Whatever it is you saw, Legate, I must've missed it.

04-10-2007, 01:42 PM	#259
Macalaure Fading Fëanorion Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: into the flood again Posts: 2,911	Gil-Galad #5 nothing #31 Makes a good point about Lommy (a redundant statement from her) Ties Lommy with Roa because of Lommy's defense of her (tied in good or evil) I see his point on Lommy, though tying her with Roa is a stretch, I think. The comment on giftedness could be a slip - or not. #38 Needs to vote: Lommy #62 Returns to say if Lommy's a wolf then Roa and Six might be, too, or they're just confused and if she's innocent the other two also look that way. This is a very vague statement, to be polite. But it's "If A is innocent, then B probably is, too" and not the trademark wolvish "If A is innocent, then B probably isn't" ---- #120 - his longest post ever In the first part, he makes some fair points analysing the votes Then it's not too clear to me how he comes from this to his suspect classification His point on Six is bogus What do you do with this. it starts really good and ends desastrous. However, I'm not sure whether it has been written with evil intent. #122 He attacks Roa because she didn't like his point about Six. This really does look bad #150 He still sees a connection between Roa and Lommy tgwbs seems innocent to him (if no co-wolf is in danger, then a wolf might want to save a villager who causes distraction, or use him to get a defendable vote. But then, Gil usually isn't too eager about defendable votes. I (innocent) thought tgwbs innocent, too, at that time) Votes Mith with reasons I don't share, but which I can understand somewhat #156 He defends himself from Roa, quite offensely Roa's accuse isn't that good in the first place, and though Gil's defense looks very weird, it seems genuine to me #210 Says the votes are too spread and if tgwbs is a wolf, we will have to use ww-math Huh? ---- #221 nothing #233 Still suspicious of Mith. His reasons for it make no sense to me whatsoever #254 He defends himself from Sixth, with fair points Votes Mith because she bugs him Will look at Roa and me if he survives (I'm not sure why he thinks he might be killed) What can I say. Usually, this would have been enough to make me suspicious, but one has to use different measures when it comes to Gil (no offense ). There are some suspicious things, but also a lot which is very typical for Gil. He remains watchworthy for me, but isn't one of my, now two, top suspects. PS: Whatever it is you saw, Legate, I must've missed it.