View Single Post
Old 04-09-2007, 06:00 PM   #229
Roa_Aoife
Ghost Prince of Cardolan
 
Roa_Aoife's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Someday, I'll rule all of it.
Posts: 1,696
Roa_Aoife is a guest of Tom Bombadil.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nogrod
This remark I can see in a new light right now. Now why on earth did a cobbler say that? Trying to contact a wolf?
Or trying to get everyone else's suspicions riled up against a dangerous player. That's why the wolves leave me alive after all.

Quote:
It indeed mirrors Roa's strategy in her last game as a cobbler and the rant she had with spm - and she also cleared me of all suspicion then as tgwbs did from Day2 onwards.
As I said at the end of my last game, my only strategy in defending you and attacking SPM was to get my identity to the wolves. I made no decisions about either of you in terms of wolvishness. But that game I had a list that I could send to the wolves every night, and through that I revealed myself. This was a special rule, specifically for that game. It is unlikely that TGWBS had the same tool.

Quote:
But I'm also a bit surprised of the way Roa decided to act as surprised with the death of Brinniel. That felt just like an undetached quasi-wonder to be made for the sake of saying something. But it's Roa and she rarely just fills in nonsense lines - and she was the one to first draw attention to these meta-reasons anyway... so she would have known?
I wasn't acting surprised; I was surprised. To be perfectly honest, I had given virtually no thought to Brin whatsoever. Seeing as Sixth's voting record had/ has almost the entire village convinced he's innocent, I was fully expecting the wolves to take him out. Another target hadn't really entered my mind. In hind sight, (especially looking through the thread now), I'm beginning to understand. (Wish I'd payed a bit more attention to that.)

Quote:
I would also like to bring forwards the way Glirdy (known wolf) acted towards Roa on Day1. YesterDay I thought it talked in favour of her but now I'm not so sure anymore.

Funny that Roa was this lenient to answer Glirdy just by way of saying that "I think you've misunderstood me entirely, or else you are intentionally misrepresenting my post". It's the nicest way I have ever seen Roa talk of any other person in this game who doubted her - unless she has had something to hide... But see also the way Glirdy gets back into line after Roa's point...
Hey, I'm nice more often than you seem to think. Besides it was less than six hours into Day 1. I had reason to be a bit more cautious in my suspicions. I'm glad I was, or I might not have started looking at TGWBS. While I was more certain he had intentionally mis-interperted my post, the possibility that he was making a genuine mistake was very real. Further more, I almost always allow for that when I see people mis-representing things. The only exceptions are when I'm evil and trying to lynch an innocent, or when I'm innocent and certain I've found a baddie.

Quote:
I know I have now laid some points for suspecting her as I'm going to retire for the night (rl) and I can only guess what kind of full-scaled attacks she could launch at me while I'm away...
I already brought up everything on Day 2. Unless I find something else on my read through and graphing (I'm graphing everyone's suspicions, etc), I don't see why I would attack you again. That'd be redundant.
__________________
We can't all be Roas when it comes to analysing... -Lommy

I didn't say you're evil, Roa, I said you're exasperating. -Nerwen
Roa_Aoife is offline   Reply With Quote