The way it looks right now, I think I will end up voting for
tgwbs. The only other person to wave a flag is
Glirdan, but I would rather hear of him tomorrow.
tgwbs:
He starts with suspecting
Lommy for thinking
Roa unsuspicious, and her reasons for this. He says
Roa's post was trying to look helpful without being helpful. I don't see how he got that particular idea. It maybe wouldn't be so suspicious to me if it wasn't so widely common to throw suspicions onto someone saying "he's trying to look helpful without being helpful", just like
Glirdan's claim
Roa is "inconsistent". It's not that he is suspicious of
Roa (everybody should), but the way he expressed it.
Then he argues with
Mith about if and how gifted should reveal their roles (without being forced to!). He criticises my point about stupid wolves, which was in a surprisingly aggressive manner for such a minor thing.
Later he defends himself against
Rikae, again going into details about gifteds.
He defends himself against
Roa, who had voted for him. The line
Nogrod quoted already indeed looks interesting. If he feels forced to be speculating about roles,
then why does he? He didn't have to, at least not to that extent.
He votes
Lommy.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by tgwbs
Roa and I are both known for loudmouths, and loudmouths have a thing for calling attention to themselves and getting lynched for no reason.
|
This one worries me greatly. It sounds like he's downplaying what he had said this Day to just being a loudmouth and calling attention to himself. It seems like it's meant to suggest we shouldn't look at his words in detail because it's all just volume.
edit: crossed with mith and nogrod