[Nogrod]

Lommy: Voted for the one that was clearly (to my mind at least) the most suspicious-looking at the time of her vote. Were she a wolf she would admittedly have brains to do the same. But lynching on Day1 a player who could be of a big help later just because of that is IMHO very short-sighted. Proposing that is almost lupine.

The Sixth: Clinged to Lommy's vote immediately with not the grandest of outspoken reasons (Lommy at least stated her reasons for suspecting Glirdy) but also he had to go then. It's hard to blame him on that either at this point I would say.

Glirdan: I don't like "retaliatory" voting at all and think it's a safe position to the wolves to hide as many tend to "understand" that kind of thing. But in the end - thinking of the cause of the villagers - it's pretty counter-productive as a villager should only try to get the wolves, not to retaliate. Every vote counts. But it's Day1 and some people do not believe we can do something with them and blah-blah... But I'm pretty uncomfortable with lynching Glirdy as it seems always turn out to be a lynching of an innocent who just looks suspicious and weakens our chances. Must think about this still.

Roa: Gives a reason to her vote which basically is not the one I think makes tgwbs look a bit suspicious. But unless there is more to be laid against her I would not vote for her toDay. The same as it is with Lommy: I wouldn't like to see a great asset go on Day1 with basically non-existant reasons.

Gil: He is a disturbing one. He states a reason, sure, but the open speculation about gifteds in that spot really confuses me. Then again I don't think a wolf-Gil would do that. And like with Glirdy, a lynched Gil normally turns out an innocent... This also makes me wonder about Roa a bit as she threw some suspicions into Gil's direction because of his gifted-speculation... a villager rarely throws suspicions against those who will not be there to answer for themselves if they are not pretty confident about their case. Maybe I should rethink about Roa still?

tgwbs: This I find somewhat suspicious or at least unnerving. He had time to play and took actively part in it but then decided to go for his first suspicion (quite weakly built case - and if one thinks of it - not an obvious choise of an innocent villager). Sad to say, but in the last game he was voting in a similar-feeling detached manner. I suspected him of that then and he turned out to be a wolf. It would be luck indeed if he were to be a wolf in two games in a row but not impossible. Still I'm a bit unhappy with voting him as the same that goes for Lommy and Roa applies to him too. I wouldn't like to lose an innocent tgwbs on Day1.

So what to say? This seems to have made me more unsure about everything...

There are still some people who have been quiet enough even though they have posted...