An observation: I'm chucking to myself how the debate seems to have subtly shifted away from people criticising those who just get some fun out of supporting the bad guys into criticising those who take the bad guys as an inspiration for sociopathy. Quite a different thing, and I'd venture to say you're as likely to find someone inspired to acts of sociopathy inspired by Tolkien's bad guys as you are to find a Leprechaun. And nobody would disagree that sociopathic behaviour is bad. Of course, saying that someone who is just into the bad guys and gets some fun out of it is evil or immoral, is actually quite rude to a lot of Downs members, who we
know are decent people.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Raynor
Frankly, moral relativism has no logical standing in a debate.
|
On the contrary. It takes centre stage in such a debate as this where we are criticising our fellow Downers for liking the bad guys and finding them entertaining (or that's the way it started anyway before the U turn!). Standing back and asking What Is Morality is vital where we are throwing around insults at decent people and casting aspersions on their moral fibre and character.
I aint going to judge others by anyone else's standards, only by my own. I won't be told who to like and who to mark down as 'immoral'.
Sorry but the thought just occurred to me that the point of this whole thread is supremely dodgy! The cheek of it! Why should
anyone tell
me or
anyone else which characters we should like and which we should dislike?!
Can we not get on to looking at the much more fruitful question of why people like bad guys rather than offending people any further?