Quote:
|
You mean you have to prove that.
|
Let us look at your argument again:
Quote:
1. if liking a bad guy is immoral
2. it would logically mean billions of people find some fun in reading about or watching bad guys would also be out slaughtering, raping and thieving
|
Since you have made said statement, the burden of proof lies on you to show the inevitability of the outcome. You need to prove that a certain liking will necessarily bring about the said actions. I am curious how.
However, if you insist that you have no burden of proof whatsoever, I will point that there is no known conditioning of human nature that
necessarily drives a person to action based on a certain liking he has. Simply having a liking does not imply that the liking will translate into intention, which will translate into action. If you know of any such law of human nature, please provide it.
What I have argued from the begining is that if morality is defined as chosing between good and evil in any situation, then <<the argument that "chosing evil in fictional settings is somehow good or morally acceptable" is false>> is a truism.