I'm here and I'm talking and the first think I've got to say is that I absolutely love yesterDay's narration!
~*~
SPM has to be a faithful. I think we'd better re-lynch him. I don't have the time right now to make a well-constructed case against him, but there are some points I wish to bring up.
Anyone else than a faithful would not say this:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Sauce
I am certain that either Lalaith or Lommy is a Faithful and, since they have both been defending each other every so often, I wonder whether they both might be.
|
Any innocent person would seriously reconsider before posting this or the other similar remarks
SPM has made about me and
Lalaith. An innocent wouldn't maybe find that suspicious, or dare to point that out. Because there are still two gifteds in the game and it's a fact that they know each others' identity. An ordo would be careful to accuse any two people with a seeming "bond" between them. A gifted would be more careful too: he could guess that such attack might reveal his role, and I don't think
SPM would be that careless as a gifted. I wouldn't post this if I thought there was any real considerable possibility of
SPM anything else than a deceitful elf-lover. (If we lynch him or and he turns out to be one of the remaining gifteds - which I very much doubt - I think you can strangle me for revealing him, and I deserve it.
)
The whole game
SPM has been making things look more sinister than they are and twisting words. Remember what he said about
Nogrod and
Roa on Day1. Besides I have the impression that people have to correct his statements about their opinions all the time.
TGWBS's and
Saucepan's relation to each other (what
Nogrod spoke about yesterday) and also their comments about each other make him look quite faithfulish too.
Also,
Saucepan's sudden fierce attack against
Lalaith (who I think innocent) kind of creeps me out.
I don't like
SPM's continuous "the wolves might be flying under the radar" -claim. While this might be true, it's a very good means of getting attention from vocal players, mainly himself.
I personally don't think
Gil's a faithful (wouldn't he show more interest in the game if he had a special role?) and his confused remark about
Glirdy being killed by the wolves speaks for his innocence, as he doesn't strike me as the wolf who plays a confused villager -type.
I'm not very suspicious of
Hookbill either. While there are suspicious things in his behaviour, I'd rather say they are beacuse of his relative newbieness and his personal style, not because he's a faithful. He seems genuine.
Legate slipping under the radar? There you might have a point, but making this great fuss about slip-under-the-radarers because (from my point of view) one mediocrely suspicious villager is very faithful-ish. By the way I must admit I have not managed to form a proper picture of
Legate,
Kath,
Mith or
Kitanna this far, just a vague impression whether they're more innocent or suspicious, and it troubles me since at least one of them is most probably a wolf.
~*~
Durelin seemed quite genuine late yesterDay... I'm not sure if I suspect her that much anymore... also, the spat between her and
SPM (who I believe to be a faithful) maybe speaks for her innocence... I don't know...
I still think
Lalaith innocent. She has good points and feels genuine. Also the first day when she voted
Holby because she thought she was the cobbler sending signs to the faithfuls... I don't think a faithful would have said that. When fabricating such accusation, a thought "what if she really is?" must cross the faithful's mind and thus I think a faithful wouldn't say that...
~*~
I think I'm going to check
TGWBS's relations to other people myself, since I don't trust
Sauce at all...
I'm also going to try to form a clear picture of the horde of unsures.