|
Lommy
Post 42 - Very neutral. She is the first person to cast suspicion on Rikae, I believe. If she were a Faithful, it would be a good chance to jump on a suspicious looking innocent.
Post 50 - Nothing
Post 54 - Votes Rikae.
Post 178 - Again, much neutrality, with a few mild suspicions.
Post 180 - Casts suspicion on Nogrod. Very neutrally, of course.
Post 182 - Voices slight suspicion of Hookbill.
Post 183 - Huge voting record. She then analyses these a little, in very weak language. "Slightly uneasy," "I don't know why," etc.
Post 185 - After Rikae has revealed roles, says she half-jokingly almost posted that Roa might be the cobbler. Perhaps a wolf who figured out the cobbler?
Post 187 - Attacks my idea of using Nogrod and Rikae as a platform. In her strongest words yet, attacks me as a potential wolf. As it is, my ideas are logical. Anything anybody says could be wolvish, including me and Lommy. However, nothing Nogrod says can be wolvish. It's therefore more sensible to heed Nogrod - so the wolves are forced to vote according to innocent logic - than to allow the wolves free reign.
Post 189 - Nothing.
Post 190 - Votes for me. Worries about durelin and Kitanna.
Post 321 - Attacks the idea of using Nogrod again. The point is not that his ideas are better or based on more knowledge, but that his ideas are not wolvish. If everybody votes according to them, they have to vote for somebody based on the reasoning of an innocent. They are not weird tactics! They make sense.
Post 322 - I think it's reasonable to assume that what Roa says is the opposite of what she means. Particularly, when she attacks somebody, I would say she definitely avoided attacking wolves.
There's not as much here pointing to wolvishness as I'd like there to be, if I'm perfectly honest. Perhaps my suspicion of Lommy was merely a knee-jerk reaction to her voting for me and attacking my idea of using known innocents.
I suppose the thing that disconcerts me most about Lommy is her neutrality and her carefulness not to accuse or defend anybody strongly (except me, Lal and durelin). Having no opinions about people is a cop-out. But I do not genuinely believe she is Faithful (though she may be) and so I cannot vote for her now, as I anticipated doing.
It is a shame I have no time today to analyse the people voting for Roa. I am certain now that I will find some Faithful among them. I'd only really trust Mith, other than me, to do this, and she probably wont have enough time either.
Looks like a no-vote from me today. Bye.
|