I will honestly admit (since there still seems to be some talk about it) that in my first post, my comment about
Hookbill was just harmless banter. Yet, as I observe him, I am beginning to question his innocence. He repeatedly admits that he is not good at this game, that he is unsure and a bit lost. While his comments do seem sincere, there is a small part of me that wonders if his confusion is just a ploy.
I believe it is
Roa who said I am a thoughtful player, and indeed I am. I must think further on this before making any actual assumptions...
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Rune Son of Bjarne
Anyways you might not belive me, but I did/do want to vote Legate, his attempt to be the voice of reason just seemed over the top. He reminds me of those ever so good people that end up being the real bad guy in cartoons. . .I don't know what else to say as their is not theory behind it, it is purly gut and feeling that legate is trying to hard.
|
Indeed, this is an interesting thought. I haven't really formed any opinions over
Legate yet, though I would like to see how he posts toDay.