[Durelin]

I might let my vote stand where it is, as though I find Rikae and Garin to be acting oddly, I don't feel like I have enough to go on them. Well, not that I really have enough to go on with Manwe, either. I know a lot of people have been overlooked by all of us, but especially when you have this many people in a village, if you try and look at everyone you'll just confuse yourself! Or, I will. If anyone thinks they can do it, please go right ahead.

Related to that note, I do agree with you, Mith, about Roa. She's loud and seems dying to lynch SPaM, but she hasn't gotten much notice. She calls him grasping, but I think surely the same could be said of her. We're all grasping for something, because someone's getting lynched, and we're trying our darnedest to get a baddie! And considering it's Day 1, there's not much to grab on to.

But as I said, Day 1, 21? villagers...insane.

Sorry, TGWBS, I totally missed this from earlier:

Originally Posted by TGWBS

Why were you worried by Glirdan not saying much, but not Kath?

Only because he was rather hypocritical. Kath made no remark about how more people should be talking, while Glirdan said "ooo, no posting going on" and "I hope there's more posting when I return" but did nothing about that. Perhaps he was not as negative about it as I likely read into his post, but...it just stood out to me more than Kath's post did. And since then, she has at least contributed some. Though, now that I think on it...I recall her posting and making remarks, but nothing really stands out to me. Makes we wonder if she's trying to maintain a helpful presence while not really making any points and/or accusations, to try and remain safe. I may be remembering completely wrong...I need to go through her posts again...

Hookbill brings up an interesting point about Manwe here that I missed:

Originally Posted by Hookbill

Now, the main reason I've refrained from joining these games is because I'm not too good a judge of character and I tend not to read into what people say... but it seems to me that you are hinting at Old Saucepan 'O as being a what do you call it... seer or whatever. Surely suggesting it would put him in danger and we would want to keep him in case he proves helpful, and shouting, "I say! I think he's the seer" will surely either lead the wolves / Were Faithfuls onto him. So... bad form old chap...

Bad form indeed. Makes me think he might be the Cobbler, rather than a Were-Faithful.

Originally Posted by Manwe

And I still want to see Nogrod lynched.

I've always disliked those sorts of remarks. People are deemed suspicious often by their "waffling" or by seeming to be uncertain, but certainty, feigned or unfeigned, bothers me. So Roa's posts have been bothering me, but I believe that to be her style. Still, style or not, I will not dismiss it.

Argh, but Nogrod brings up a good point - one I quite agree with, and I believe touched on earlier. We always go after the same people, the ones that are perhaps "easy targets." I'm sure part of it is that we all (well, most of us) want to survive, at least for a few Days. But does that mean the "easy targets" necessarily aren't baddies? I tend to dismiss bold people as likely innocents, and I feel like that's a bad habit, though going after only the bold ones is one, too.

Ah, Middle Road, where have you gone? Oh, yeah...this is WW.

Nogrod - You suggested the possibility of looking at things anew. Any new thoughts?

Edit: Crossed with Holby, Lalaith