Then we do have crossed fishing lines somewhere. Your words are now as clear as cloudless sky. Though on your point about my accusations I cannot see how they are more ambiguous than everyone elses. The moments after such a horrific event are usually dominated with flying accusations with little evidence.
I picked you because (and in hindsight perhaps wrongly on light of what you actually meant) your pouncing on poor
Glirdan's posting seemed only to reflect what everyone else was doing, whether merely commenting on his first activities or labelling him as suspicious I still felt you were following suit with
Nogrod and
Roa, who also immediately pounced upon him.
Glirdan I have noticed seems to be always quickly accused and eliminated. Perhaps he does not help himself still on most occasions he has proven innocent. That was my reasoning for choosing you three. As simple as that. *Points to 1st post, I thought it outlined my reasons for choosing them clear*
I threw
SPaM into the furry mix for no other reason that to throw an accusation.
That and I am curious as to why he believes that Hookbill is the shady character I am sure he is...that and he was agreeing with what I was saying. Perhaps he is trying to take shelter under my innocent shadow is all I am saying. Though why
Nogrod would want to argue against
SPaM if
SPaM is indeed a Faithful, though strange tactics are always a foot. Perhaps a double bluff...