View Single Post
Old 02-22-2007, 07:04 AM   #9
The Squatter of Amon Rûdh
Spectre of Decay
 
The Squatter of Amon Rûdh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Bar-en-Danwedh
Posts: 2,178
The Squatter of Amon Rûdh is a guest at the Prancing Pony.The Squatter of Amon Rûdh is a guest at the Prancing Pony.
Send a message via AIM to The Squatter of Amon Rûdh
Pipe Notes on some of the issues above

I've seen some nice speculative outcomes for the Gondorian side of the equation on this thread, but little on the side of the combatants whom Gandalf 'abandons'. With that in mind, I shall examine some of the outcomes on the battlefield that result from Gandalf's decision, whether he would have been able to predict them or not. Hopefully I can at least demonstrate that Gandalf made the right decision, although he did so with an incomplete idea of its implications and deep misgivings about the impact it would have.

The most significant figure whose death is clearly brought about by the interruption of Gandalf's confrontation with the Witch-King is Theoden. His succession is assured, since he named Eomer as his heir before riding to the battle, and he is, in any case, an old man, who has already been saved from a far worse fate than death in battle. From his final words, we know that he feels his death to be fitting and acceptable, and he certainly achieves a grandeur in his last moments that would not be achieved by awaiting another, natural dotage. There would be nothing noble in Faramir's death on his father's pyre. Such an event would be sordid and tragic at the best of times, but is particularly so when Denethor's despair is so utterly deluded.

Theoden's death brings me neatly to other events of great importance to future developments. Most significant is the death of the Witch-king, which takes place as it does only because Eowyn and Merry are present at the fall of the king. This event motivates them to an attack that would have been unnecessary had Gandalf faced the chief Ringwraith himself, and which neatly fulfills the prophecy concerning his death. Although the Witch-king would in any case have suffered the same fate as his fellows when the Ring was destroyed, the damage inflicted on the enemy chain of command by their leader and champion's death at this stage and in this manner should not be discounted.

Stemming from the encounter over Theoden's corpse is Eowyn's presence in the Houses of Healing, which is a vital period in the development of her character. It is only as the more mature character who emerges from her stay there that she is able to fulfill her potential as one of the rebuilders of the Gondorian realms after the fall of Sauron. Had Gandalf not chosen to rescue Faramir, she would simply have died on the battlefield, a tragic, despairing young woman with her life unlived.

Allied to these positive outcomes from Theoden's death, we have the catastrophic implications for Gondor if their Steward and his heir were to be destroyed in so cataclysmic a manner. Such an event could be enough to tear the heart out of Gondor just when her last reserves of strength and courage were most needed, and the discord that could spread from the divided loyalties of the Citadel guards might prove debilitating at a crucial point in the War of the Ring. Most important of all, there is genuine evil in the situation that Gandalf barely resolves, which is not found on the battlefield: Sauron has warped and corrupted an honourable and courageous leader at a vital time, causing him to act in a manner that is entirely morally bankrupt and counter to the interests of his people. A father is poised to kill his one remaining son, who is also the last scion of his dynasty and a future political leader of Gondor. Even as a deputy to Aragorn, Faramir has a key role to play, but Denethor can see no value for him other than as ruling steward. As has been pointed out above, there is more tragedy in a struggle between opposing goods, however small, than one between aggressor and defender. For these reasons, Gandalf is morally bound to save Faramir and attempt to redeem his father, not simply for his own sake but for that of Gondor, the House of Stewards and the successful resistance of Sauron. Gandalf could not be expected to predict some of the benefits of his choice, but he knew enough to choose the course of action that brought them about. Although we can assume many deaths on the battlefield as a result of Gandalf's choice, in dramatic terms he exchanges the aged and victorious Theoden, killed in the execution of his greatest deed, for the young, troubled Faramir, whose greatest acts lie ahead of him and who stands to be murdered while he sleeps. Overall, it seems a fair judgement.

Out of evil, then, some good is salvaged. This brings me neatly to the presence or otherwise of Eru in LR and Son of Numenor's interesting theory. Admittedly Eru is not as far as I can remember mentioned by name, but there are several references to the One, which were referred to in Tolkien's last radio appearance. Since Eru is often given the byname The One, I think we can safely conclude that he is present in LR, albeit very much in the background. If one were feeling pedantic, one might say that the conception of Eru current in Tolkien's imagination in the late 1940s is present, just as Sindarin and Quenya are present in the forms they took at the time of composition and revision. These may be fossilised stages of a perpetually evolving imaginative world, but that does not negate their presence.
__________________
Man kenuva métim' andúne?

Last edited by The Squatter of Amon Rûdh; 02-22-2007 at 08:24 AM. Reason: Strengthened two of my points, but mainly phrasing
The Squatter of Amon Rûdh is offline   Reply With Quote