May I ask a question before you condemn me? Why am I suspected only of thinking Lal innocent? Yes I have now been proved wrong, but I'm not suspected because I think Mith innocent, or Lommy. We have no proof that either of those is innocent or guilty. Is it merely because you agree with me on those points that you must jump on the other? I know I was wrong about Lal, but yesterDay I didn't think I was.
To answer Lommy: I have been quite silent. I've actually had far less time to spend here than I thought I would (a social life suddenly appeared out of nowhere!), and that wasn't helped by the fact that the internet here has been failing on a regular basis. In addition, I've not been doing 'proper' analyses, so I probably do look quieter anyway.
My opinions remain the same as they did yesterDay, and again I am going to vote early.
++FIREFOOT
She has only become helpful after suspicion was placed upon her.
Ah well, it was nice playing with you all anyway.
