Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Lalwendë
Now there's a thought. Eomer agrees with Morm that a swift lynching is the way to go. But please chaps, take care, for a swift lynching and swift decision making usually results in bandwaggoning and an innocent is then killed. Note, Eomer, what you say about the good sense of Rune and Roa in preaching against overconfidence. Unless of course, there is a sinister intention to being overconfident and wishing for a quick lynch.........  |
Lal, you have a good point. I'd be tempted to vote
Eomer solely based on that - my own suspicions being as feeble as they are - but I refrain from it, because that might be meant in a different way (see below) and I would probably feel very bad about voting
Eomer again on Day1, especially if he happens to be innocent.
I think
morm's not for a quick lynching, rather he's trying to provoke reactions. Whether
Eomer really agrees with him here (which makes
Lal's point half-pointless) or he really supports quick lynchings, is up to the reader. I find it always too difficult to distinguish humour and serious opinions in ww...
EDIT: add - now I'm really going
