Quote:
|
Originally Posted by littlemanpoet
It is also interesting that Tolkien says that there is no humanly acceptable answer to the problem of evil if one posits a wholly good God (or Eru), which I still insist The Silmarillion does, in spite of how it can be taken out of context.  |
Yes, context!
I think the missing link in understanding Tolkien's cosmology is in the process by which it was assembled.
The process of writing The Lord of the Rings was holographic, not creative. He assembled a beautiful Metaphor out of a tiny fragment of human experience - his own. It was testament to nothing more than the word-thoughts which arose in him as he experienced reality unfolding, yet in it each of us can find our entire lives reflected.
Gandalf tells Frodo to take pity on Smeagol. Why? There are two possibilities.
1) Pity is an epiphenomenon of random processes, and it 'feels' biologically good to express pity.
2) Gandalf knows that Smeagol has never done anything wrong in his life.
It would not have mattered if Frodo fried Smeagol on the spit and feasted on him with Sam. But hey, we all read the book: we know he didn't!
