What I see at the moment is:
- a safe wolf kill
- one wolf whose play was concentrated on not offending anyone and not drawing the attention of many people on her
- another safe wolf kill
My assumption is that the second wolf plays similarly as Celuien, therefore my high suspicion of Eomer. He has not said anything that I could point out and proof his wolvishness with. He remains in the back of the scene and only makes some points about people who are already suspected by others - like Celuien did.
Of course, my assumption might be wrong, but I think I'll give it a try.
I'm not sure what to think of the Valier-Naria-conspiracy yet.
Nogrod, befriending? If I thought that morm would fall for something like that I would really be playing unintelligently. morm voted me with a reason that I think was founded on a misunderstanding. This I wanted to tell him.
Maybe it's just my perception of it, but I really feel like you are twisting the truth about me. This is what I would expect you to do as a cobbler (therefore my suspicion of Cobrod): as wordy as usual, elegantly bending the truth to entangle everybody in it, friendly and flattering to not make too many people vote you, only aggressive when you are able to make a really good case. I tried to pin you down over the night, but it's not possible for me. If cobbler you are, then you are a frightening one, if not, I'm sorry about my suspicions.
And of course I know that backstabbing a fellow wolf is a decent tactic, but it's also a little unfair one. If it is foreseeable that a fellow goes down, then it's understandable, but the way I urged her lynching, it would have been a little mean, wouldn't it?
|