Ah, there you are.
I favour the succinct. That might explain later reasoning.
Rooting out werewolves and cobblers. There shall be grand theories, but they will not come into play on the first day. (Barring any major slip-up by the baddies.)
Werewolves could employ any tactic on day one. Stereotyping is tempting but requires careful thought before we actually cast our votes.
Cobblers are the interesting new factor at this ball. It is tempting to rush into a mode of cobbler-accusations but I feel this will get us nowhere. No cobbler will be foolish enough to outright defend his/her cherished werewolf without good reason on Day One. The cobbler has to trust in the corresponding wolf; has to trust that they will get past a few days together. Then, in the later part of the game, alliances are all the more relevant. I believe it is very likely that there will be no visible link between the wolves and the cobblers at this early stage.
It wouldn't surprise me if a wolf tried to turn the debate into such useless accusations of cobblery.
To leave a trail (always a good survival tactic
)
—Rikae seems innocent to me. Fairly sure a wolf would not make the posts she has made.
—Farael, too, seems innocent to me. His bold approach is suited to stir the pot, and could even be designed to incur wrath (especially from the quiet ones
)
—Cailín is innocent. So wonderful and darling and fair. In fact, I'd say it's probably physically, mathematically, and yea! logically impossible for her to be evil.
I currently suspect Kath, Valier, Naria and Lalwendë.
...