I've actually considered bringing this up before, although I think it would need to go in Mirth.
Quote:
|
What would the debate be? Or did I miss that?
|
For example, a round might work like this. The mod would choose a topic (such as "Characters whose names begin with F", "Weapons," or "Downs fora"). Each player is assigned a character/object within the topic - for those topics you might get "Frodo", "Anduril", or "Mirth." It is then up to that player to argue why you should be kept around. Arguments might be "I save Middle-earth," "I was possibly the most powerful sword to exist, having been both Narsil and Anduril," and "I make people laugh and have the favorite threads of Werewolf and Crazy Captions." Once arguments are all posted (a time limit is recommended... anyone who does not post in the time limit would be automatically kicked out or something like that - up to the mod), then the arguments are voted on - Manwe said by non-players, but the way I've played it is where the players of the round vote. I would do this by pm, bearing in mind arguments that have occurred when people feel insulted or what not, with the mod just posting the results. And unlike Survivor, you don't vote based on your favorite item in the round but on who makes the best/worst argument. Person with the most votes is thrown out and it continues until there's only one person left.
Personally I don't see why it would be necessary to limit it to six people, either... I've played with a lot more.