Quote:
|
Originally Posted by me
I almost got you there at the end, Di! But poor Boro got the axe instead.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Di
You are very lucky you did not succeed, as standing in the way of my revenge would have shot you right to the top of my "to kill" list.
|
If I would've succeeded you would've died, and so moving to the top of your "to kill" list wouldn't have mattered.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Di
Yes, in this game I'm just trying to see how annoyingly petty I can be before people lynch me for the pure frustration of it.
|
Consider this a friendly warning. Saying stuff like that is going to get you lynched, for it confirms our fears about the WWs- that they have been ordered by
Fea to be as chaotic, frustrating, and random as possible to fit with the theme of the village.
And I wish everyone wouldn't have complained about the lack of clarity in the narration. If everyone had just assumed
morm's innocence (the likeliest possibility given the percentages) then someone could've matter-of-factly asked
Fea to put up a tally on her opening day post. But now that
Fea knows it is causing confusion, she is likely to leave it be.
Personally I believe that
morm was innocent. Yes, the conversation hints at the Dark Lady's displeasure with her servants, but it seems clear to me that she is displeased with their DAILY activities, not nightly. They weren't wise during the day, and failed in their task of "sundering hearts" somewhat during the day.
And later, she says “I promised you blood to sustain your precarious lives. And blood shall be spilt.” Notice she said she was about to spill blood to sustain "lives", not "life". If she spills the blood of one of her own WWs (kills them) she would be failing to sustain their "lives" with blood, for in the spilling one of the lives would be ended, not sustained.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Nogrod
But if we are to read any hints from the narration I would say that the Dark Lady was not impressed with the performance of her minions (truism?). So were they not causing enough confusion? Were they too careful / quiet?
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Nogrod
It would at least give some credit to the thought already mentioned by myself and a few others that the wolves might have been careful or quiet on Day1.
|
That is not the conclusion that I would draw from the narrative. First, keep in mind that the narrative may be meaningless. But if the narrative is true, then the WWs probably were
not timid and quiet on day 1. The Dark Lady tells them that they were "brave" but "not wise". This leads me to believe that the WWs were in the thick of things, but possibly dangerously close to lynching each other, or perhaps dangerously close to getting themselves lynched due to their non-timid behavior.