The retired general is going to retire for some sleep now.
But if any one of you has extra time I think looking at the following things might be of help to us:
- The "safe votes" with regards to what we know now and about the innocence or "guilt" of the people involved.
- The trust / suspect relations between people voiced in the game so far. The wolves would like to make friends with the villagers they think might suspect them in a strong way and accuse those they believe would not do that... surely considerations
in situ (on situatiation) should be noted.
- Pondering about the possible activeness / staying in the "shadowness" of the wolves. Meaning whether
Lommy is right about
Rune's death (the wolves feared "
Rune the Seer" had got one of them) or if
Boro is right (they confidently killed yet another quiet one to make the loud ones to go for each other, themselves grinning in the background).
PS.
Boro being right with this fact does not mean he is innocent, quite on the contrary... it might point him being the one who came up with this tactics in the first place.
And
Lommy might also be seen as revealing the tactics of the wolves just to look good and still being vague enough not to reveal anything of importance...
As I said before: with the Nightly killing record we have I'm not going to trust anyone for a while... There is at least one very crafty wolf involved here.