I seem to be the only one who doesn't find
Durelin particularly suspicious. (Not that she seems innocentish either.) But I don't see anything wrong with her list of possible
Rikae-killing scenarios. She just lists all the possibilities. What I would anyway have liked to find in her post is her own personal opinion of which option she thinks is correct. The lack of that is the only reason for me to be a little wary of her based on that post.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Cod
As Thinlomien has apparently dropped her suspicions of my venerable person, I see no reasons to continue suspecting her (though, if she were to act out in some way, then the case will be otherwise).
|
Now what is the logic here?! Sorry, but I don't get your point. If I suspect you, I'm suspicious, if not I'm not so suspicious? Retaliatory (sp?) is a lame word for that logic. Care to elaborate?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by CoD
I am not that suspicious of Naria anymore, since she has not posted much.
|
Hmm...? How does one's silence make her (or him) less suspicious?
Yesterday, I did not understand
CoD's sense of humour. Today, I don't understand his logic...
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Boro
Thinlomien, I think at times you look too deeply into stuff . . .
|
I might.
I can't help feeling that
Gurth's bandwagoning (yes, I know that was the
first vote of the day). I know that it's no wonder that many people are suspicious of the same person, but this just raises eyebrows a bit. Maybe it's just a feeling.
Diamond, I think your logic about
Noggie killing
Rikae is a bit flawed. If he wanted to kill a silent one, why
Rikae, the one he had remarked about the day before? Why not
Farael,
Gurthang,
Volo,
Rune or
Naria who he lists today as "no read-out" (I got the feeling he'd want these people to contribute/speak more) and has no visible connection with?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Nogrod
PS. Lommy goes a bit too far: she willl be here 24/3˝...
|
Note to self: always think before you write...
