It's hard to explain exactly what I'm getting, but I'm going to try my best.
Obviously after Mac's intentional defense of Rikae one or two posts defending his stand on it is expected, it'd be highly questionable if he hadn't. However I read through his posts several times and the more he defended himself and Rikae the more I saw him as a Thing. I find it a bit odd he's pretty much not even considering Rikae as a possible Thing choice and in defending himself he must restate what he's said in many of his posts. I feel it's all overkill on his part and that he's trying to cover his tracks by repeating the same thing only in different words. I'd take a different stance on Mac altogether if he had made his intentional post, defended it, maybe clarified it and then moved on, but he hadn't. I find him overly defense over a little matter and I can't help but think he's trying to use Rikae as a human shield.
If that only makes sense to me, then so be it, but that's how I see the situation.
__________________
"Let us live so that when we come to die even the undertaker will be sorry." - Mark Twain
|