I had been leaning towards voting for Lommy, but rereading the posts it seems like she is being condemned primarily for being suspicious of me, and I'm not sure that's a solid reason since rereading my first post, since I can see how it does look suspicious. It occurs to me that an innocent Lommy would be an asset to the village. I'm not saying I don't suspect her, I'm just wondering whether I, and the others who accused her, were not being hasty.
There are also new questions in my mind. Why does Mac say he agrees with Nogrod, when Nogrod has said that Mac looked suspicious? And why did Nogrod want Volo not to vote for Mac?
Perhaps when Nogrod says the things were laughing in the shadows, he knows of what he speaks? He also seems to have a tendency, since he showed up today, to group Lommy, Mac and I together more than our being the most active posters this morning would warrant. What I mean is, he seems to be pushing the idea that "all three are innocent" to a degree that suggests he is trying to hide something in that grouping. Just a possibility, nothing more - but I may have been wrong about Mac's remark to Lommy making them both look suspicious - it would also make sense if only Mac was a thing.
EDIT- X posted with Nogrod
|