Alas for poor Sleepy Cowell. He was surely not the nicest person on earth but didn't deserve death.
*a mourning song with a didgeridoo*
Folwren's first post caught my attention.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Folwren
And don't try to derive any strange and twisted meaning out of this first post be cause there isn't any.
|
Hmmm? Weirdly said, made me wary of her... Somehow over-defensive maybe? But she's been making sense otherwise, so maybe I'm just imagining things. (A wolf can make sense and sound convincing too, though, it has been proved in a few games...) I don't know what to think of her, but I guess that I won't be voting her today (she contributes), but I'll keep an eye on her, at least before she explains that statement of hers.
Glirdy certainly flip-flops, but I of all people won't be accusing him for it.
After all, if one tries to make a reasonable vote on Day One before even a half of the day has passed the result is most probably that the reasoning is quite weak and thus the vote is quite "random". A weakly reasoning-based vote is however very different from a random one that has no reason - even a weak one - behind it at all (like
Durelin's). Hopefully that made sense. I don't see
Glirdan or
Durelin as very suspicious ones (
Durelin, as far as I know, plays normally like that) though certainly not as sure innocents either ie their behaviour gives me no clue of their roles.
That's all I have to say right now, except I could echo
Mac that no one seems particularly suspicious.