"Three cheers for the Ranger!
Cheer! Cheer! Cheer!
Kath, where did
Boro say that if Naria turned out to be innocent it is likely that Lommy was not? I think you refer to this:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Kath
Thinks either Lommy or Naria is suspicious, the guilt of one depending on the innocence of the other.
|
in your Boro-analysis. But that came from:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Boro
The whole I'm suspicious of Thinlo, but if she's innocent I think Naria looks suspicious, just seems all too awkward.
|
There he quotes the reasons that
Menel gave. It's absolutely not his own suspicion - on the contrary. It's not even saying 'if Naria's innocent Lommy is not', but 'if Lommy's innocent Naria's not'. Are you twisting Boro's words? Even if it was just a fault, it is not a good reason for a vote, though I agree that good reasons for votes are rare at the moment.
Regardless I agree with you that
Lommy is worth a closer look, but this kind of reason makes me suspicious on you again.
In retrospect,
Sleepy's vote for
Naria yesterday is a little suspicious. Since all remaining four would have had to agree on one other suspect, it basically sealed her fate."