<font face="Verdana"><table><TR><TD><FONT SIZE="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Animated Skeleton
Posts: 33</TD><TD></TD></TR></TABLE>
Okay. . .
I've been gone for a little while and just got back. Here is what think: Celeborn, ya he was kinda dull, didn't do much.
Sam, how could you insult Sam? He is the noblest creature in ME. More so even then Frodo. Because Frodo went knowing what he did, Sam went not knowing, and that's worse. And as for Horrible Old Hobbit, that's right out! I do agree that Sam was "nasty" to Smeagol but if you will forgive me he was a murdering, thieving, conniving, treacherous, being who deserved to be under constant suspicion. Sam could have been a lot "nastier" then he was.
Tom Bombadil, was intersesting, funny and saved the Hobbits, he was an okay guy (but DID sing too much and TOO silly).
Elrond was cool. He did what was needed, he could have done more but (obviously) he didn't need to. I have to agree with red "elfies" was too much. I don't get he thing about red and Elrond, why did it even need to be discussed?
Legolas, he was noble, he was an Elf, and he was a prince he deserved to be a little self-absorbed. He (funny this seems to apply to most good elves. - the felloship part ) did what the fellowship needed him to do.
Thats it, until more of you (or the same ones) decide to grace me with more of your preferences.
</p>
|