Interesting thoughts here! I see that
Celuien just couldn't resist moving the discussion to Books! Great choice of thread, eh,
lmp
A couple of points come to my mind as I read over your posts here. First, if LotR is a matter of Tolkien appropriating Romance for his story, does that use of Romance so thoroughly alter the depiction of men as well as of women? Second, is Tolkien, in both cases--his letter to his son and his creative writing--engaged in discussing or portraying cultural constructs of women? And, thirdly, what would it mean to portray women this way--"free of the dross" as we seem to say here on the Barrow Downs. Is this a matter of Tolkien's faith assuming that human sexual identity is all part and parcel of "evil" in this world?
Tolkien's letter finds fault with the courtly love mode, after all.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Celuien
I was thinking most specifically of the letter we were debating over on the planning thread, and wondering if there's a case to be made that Tolkien, since he didn't seem to like the state of things to which he made reference in that letter, might have altered it in the same way as he altered the Orcs.
|
You mean, his curious ways of sidestepping the issue of moral choice and redemption of orcs?
And, what ever was behind
Fea's outburst that Tolkien can go suck lemons? Perhaps she should join this discussion here, eh?