I am not surprised. My search of JennyHallu's post turned up very little said about both Spawn and Kath.
Jenny in post 100 outlines everybody in the village and says the following things, now obviously either Jenny, Spawn or the third duck (kath) are innocent being day 1 and all.
Quote:
DSoU: She's only posted twice today, so don't expect to see a lot here. She had some confusion as to the rules that's been picked up on as a reason for vote. This makes little sense to me. I'd like to hear more from Spawn, but I don't think her question says anything towards her quackiness
Kath: Says little, but to the point. No opinion
Nilp: Voted for himself...seems to be standard operating procedure. Withholding judgment (or any sort of opinion, really) until tomorrow.
|
Yet on most others she has some sort of opinion.
Post 105 all suspicions of known innocents, not that this in and of itself means a lot but let me explain.
Nilp, Jenny, and Spawn seem to have not mentioned each other much at all and never brought any strong suspicion against each other. I've demonstrated that they've been all but silent on Kath. The people against whom they spoke, with the exclusion of me, are all known innocents. If their behavior patterns remains consistent, which I believe it would, it should follow that the final duck was seldom mentioned. All the ducks, obviously not Nilp, but Kath included have attempted to bring up a case against me. Think about that.