[Nogrod]

Oh, and just to come back with this confusion of yesterday. I don't think we can come up with much of it - it should be seen though. There might be something...

I think, most of us saw Mith's case as a genuine one - as I do still look at it. Then Glirdy's announcement took us with a blow. But there was a good case to check his revealment, as he offered us a duck (unlike Mith) - and it turned out to be one. Glirdy's revealment was somewhat too careful anyhow - giving us a duck (that another duck would know - and after hearing, that they were one more after the night - would be bold enough to risk it), but only an already revealed innocent (Spm).

Anyhow: if Mith is a duck, she would be certain enough to reveal only real innocents... I hope we don't lose this scenario from our minds, even though I believe her to be true as for now.

Lote's vote for Mith might be genuine, but anyhow, as it was given at a critical moment, when no-one knew, how the things would turn out, and as it was against our common good - checking the duck-revealment by Glirdy - it could be seen as a trial to wrench the vote... I'm quite near to vote for her again tonight... But just a second.