Quote:
|
Originally Posted by mormegil
Those who didn't mention Nilp at all are:
Spawn
Elu
Glirdan
Those who said little or nothing of any substance on the matter are:
Mithalwen
Nogrod
Kath
Cailin
Those who appeared to defend him beyond saying it's traditional are:
Anguirel
JennyHallu
Out of this list I find Cailin's comment to be the most odd but the other three weren't far behind. And out of the defenders JennyHallu seemed to be trying in earnest to save Nilp, while Anguirel was more or less pointing out that, for Nilp, the self-vote is a virtual requirement. Jenny actually voted for the runner up at a critical point
In regards to the three who didn't say anything, all three didn't post much so it's more difficult to gauge why they didn't.
Due to the voting I'm willing to think Valier innocent currently.
|
There are a few funny things in here.
First of all. So skillful player as he seemingly is (I've only played once with him before this), from his analysis, he seems to totally forget those who have had something against Nilp! Kind of wanting us to focus on these others? There might be some Nilp-voters in yesterday's tally - case Valier comes to mind. But even more, I am worried about those, who just suspected Nilp duckishly-lightly enough to secure their backs (not voting, not straightly accusing, but still "suspecting" or "keeping an eye"...)
Secondly. His point about the four people he (rigthly) called "saying little or nothing of any substance", that:
Quote:
|
Out of this list I find Cailin's comment to be the most odd but the other three weren't far behind.
|
If you really look at the comments - so nicely given to us by Morm (#121), you may judge by yourselves. There seems to be nothing odd in them - at least I can't see them as odd, and would very much like to hear Morms points concerning their oddity.
And if Ang is right with the suspicion about Morm, then I must say our Owl-talk was not in vain after all...
I'll try to do some re-reading next.
EDIT: X-posted with quite a few...