Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Thalion
The problem with this argument is that in reality, the stories WERE NOT PASSED DOWN...Tolkien, for as much as he claimed to have "discovered" elements of his tales and to have been working on how they came to be in existence today when the history was supposed to take place years and years ago, created every story that we have from his own mind... he may have made revisions, but one can hardly consider that as the same as passing down stories from generations to generations...and again...Tolkien, as a philologist, choose his words carefully...since he was ulitmately the one writing the "final" stories as we would see them (or as he was working on them to become final) he wasn't restrained to believe whatever a past "story teller" communicated to him...
|
I think the point is that the TC was a central concept for Tolkien. As far back as the BoLT a primary concern was not simply the stories themselves but the means by which those stories had survived, had been transmitted from the time of the events they recorded down to the time he himself translated them for a modern readership. His model, as Flieger shows in 'Interrupted Music' was the ancient texts like the Mabinogion (taken from the Red Book of Hergest among others - & that title being the same as the one he gave Bilbo's work is probably not a coincidence). Ancient stories survived down through time in place names, manuscripts, folklore & songs, as we know, but most importantly they survived in varying versions, many of which were contradictory.
It is this illusion of verisimilitude which Tolkien strove to create in order to bring a sense of 'reality' to the stories of the Legendarium. A careful reading of LotR, for instance, will reveal that there are various 'styles' incorporated in that work (the passages referring to the Rohirrim for example are full of alliteration) this gives a sense that LotR is a 'compendium' (there's also a mention in the text of 'Findegil the King's scribe' who is one in a series of 'compilers/redactors' in a long sequence of transmission).
Moving on to the Notion Club Papers we see Tolkien trying a different method of transmission - psychic(memory) & physical (reincarnation).
The cetral importance of this aspect for Tolkien can be seen in the very fact that he introduces himself into the Legendarium as 'translator'. He 'appears' in the story both in the Prologue & in Appendix F. This both makes him part of the secondary world he has created &, paradoxically, separates him from it in that he becomes not the maker of the stories but merely the last one who passes them on. So they become not
Tolkien's mythology, but
England's. He's effectively saying 'This is not my
my mythology, its
ours. So, as Flieger has so effectively shown, there have to be 'discrepancies', 'contradictions' in the text. These don't make the Legendarium less 'believable' as Myth, but actually more so, because they make it just like the genuine myth/legend cycles we have.
In short, the contradictions are inevitable, necessary & most importantly
deliberate. Think of all the named writers, loremasters & bards within the Legendarium. These are individuals, producing their own works, which are collated & passed on by others.