Nay, good sir. You mistake me. Of course voting and discussing are essential parts of this game. If we didn't talk, we would be in the same boat tomarrow. If we didn't vote today, there would be no record to analyze tommarrow. You need to build a case, or at least a gut feeling, but how can you do that today, when there are no brick lying around? You can't. That is why suspicion should not be implied today.
And of course I will be participating. Its just that many time I find that at the end of the day, when my vote is due, I have not reasonable candidate. Hence the seventh person on the list deal. Naturally, if I find a person deserving of accusation I will vote for him over the seventh person, but if none turn up, I am left with this.
I hope this is clear, as I'm certainly not calling for a board-wide boycott. That would be most unwise and most unproductive.
EDIT:
What's 'specious' mean? Did you mean 'suspicious'? Just curious.
__________________
I've got bridge club on Wednesday,
Archery on Thursday,
Dancing on a Friday night!
|