TGWBS you and your wolf proclaiming annoy me.
I happened to look the WWJ-thread and there Fea proclaimed she was a wolf and was found to be one. That example surely doesn't benefit you. Also, I'm wondering why are you putting all this "I'm a wolf" show up. I can see two possible reasons: 1. You are a wolf and want to look like too weird to be a wolf. 2. You want to create suspicion so that you won't get killed by the wolves. Either way, I don't like your tactics.
Quote:
Well, Lommy appears on the list because she’s such a genuinely nice girl.
|
A phrase that I would normally take as a compliment sounds like an accusation in a game of WW.
(All quotes by Cailín)
Quote:
Ho-hum. She spent the first day agreeing with others…
|
That's the only thing you can do if you want to participate and don't have any great new ideas. I wasn't merely agreeing, though, I was also making comments on ideas. (Not that that's much more, but...)
Quote:
She seems to consider all sides of the argument, which is a very Dutch and unproductive way to go about things.
|
What should I do then? Say a half of my thoughts and appear short-sighted and more importantly, desert my point.
Quote:
Then suddenly she follows Anguirel, voting Glirdan whom she did not suspect before.
|
I can't recall that I was voicing suspicions of anyone on Day 1. So, following that logic whoever I had voted would have brought that accusation against me. Lovely.
Quote:
Later on, she states she made a wrong decision.
|
Ummm... I probably did. As I said before I didn't have time to go through all older posts and had no idea who to vote so I just voted someone who seemed a bit suspicious and who had gathered some votes, so I wouldn't doom Garin, who I assumed was maybe innocent. Later, I got a chance to skim through Glirdan's posts and didn't find anything suspicious there, so I told my fellow villagers that I believed him probably innocent.
Quote:
Did she try to align herself with an innocent? Convenient that Ang died last night, then. This is odd though. And really very nice, too.
|
Care to explain a bit?
Quote:
Today she considers Lhuna’s case, and points our attention towards the silent ones. She further says nothing particularly interesting, except for a slight concern she might be trusting Spawn too much (and don’t we all?).
|
If you think that's uninteresting I think most of the people here (not all though) haven't said anything much more interesting.
Quote:
I’m a bit worried about you, Thin.
|
You should be. I might get to be a lynched innocent.
As to my suspicions... I'm again afraid of the silent ones.
Valier's response makes me feel less suspicious about her. Still, I don't understand why is she using code language.
Naria is scarily silent. I may vote her.
Lhuna is a bit suspicious. I'm not going to repost all the arguments against her, but I do find her a bit strange.
Further suspicions need more reading.
And I seem to have xposted with a lot of people.