Quote:
|
in the Second Age, he was a mere flunky. Not a worthy winner at all.
|
Being second in command to a King instead of King does not make someone unworthy in any way. They are still the same person.
If we use your logic, we should vote off all non-kings, yet I doubt that is truly what you want to see, Mister Pan-Man.
Quote:
|
It was the "tra-la-la-lallies" what done it.
|
Wait a minute. Your previous quote claimed that what happened during the
Second Age was what was important, and yet here you try to use as evidence something that happened in the
Third Age.
You can't have it both ways. Only one of those rather poor arguments can be used. One disqualifies the other.