Lommy, let me clarify my now infamous Post #57:
My vote
was completely random, as I felt that there was no evidence for me to follow. I don't think I would have voted for THE Ka, certainly not with all that bandwagoning going on. Of course, I'm not going to be making those 'flighty' (good word, by the way) votes any more, especially as the evidence increases. There was just a derth of information on that first day.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Lommy
And you suggest that we all just accuse each other totally randomly before the seer comes out?!? And all the gifteds should come out so that they'd be killed? A very fine theory, Eonwe.
|
No, no of course not. That would be, um, less than smart, to say the least. This is how it works:
Everyone tries to lynch peole they think are guilty (basically you play the game). Hopefully, you can get one or even two wolves. Then, somewhere down teh line, the seer can check of three or four people from
everyone's list, the ranger and teh hunter can each take one off (hopefully) and the list suddenly gets rather more narrow. And puts the remaining wolves in a very much tighter place. Of course, this only happens when there is sufficiently few people to make the list small enough to be useful. (AKA, no, the gifted do NOT rush out wildly proclaiming their innconce.) I hope that was more clear than before.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Lommy
But we can try not to be! I don't think the best way of avoiding a mistake is voting randomly.
|
Of course we can. The whole point is to educate yourself as best you can, and vote accordingly.