[The Saucepan Man]

I have been reviewing mormegil's case against tar-ancalime. While much of it is circumstantial, and some of it is based on what I think were jokey or "in-character" comments, he makes a very good point here:

Originally Posted by mormegil

Forgoes changing her vote because she doesn’t want to make it uninformed citing Kath’s previous example. It’s interesting though that she had some strong thoughts on Garin and yet didn’t vote for him when she could have.

Tar has accepted that this was a mistake but said that, if she had voted for Garin, that would have been seen as Wolfish too. Actually, as I have said, I am more inclined to believe that those who vote for innocent villagers who are likely to be lynched (and thereby shown to be innocent) are likely to be innocent themselves, because it is such risky behaviour for a Wolf. To express strong suspicions about an innocent villager and then not vote for him, leaving others to do the lynching, looks a lot more suspicious to me.

Originally Posted by Eomer of the Rohirrim

Incidentally, am I being shrill or smooth or both? Because I'm enjoying the advantages and disadvantages of both at the moment.

Actually, it seems to me that you are being both by turn. Although, I am not sure what to make of that. I would expect a Wolf to be more consistent, but it may be designed to confuse us.