Ha ha! What a majestic title!
So this post is about Farael. His actions and the response to those actions have been quite interesting.
He comes out with a blistering attack on Aiwendil, which — while I don't think is particularly strong — is still pretty interesting. Nevertheless, general reaction to the attack is peculiar:
-Aiwendil shrugs it off, basically saying
'You're wrong'
-Celuien deduces that Farael is very probably innocent.
-Nilpaurion declares that Farael is likely innocent.
-Lhunardawen declares that Farael is innocent.
-No-one else questions Farael.
I thought that maybe Farael was one of the Seers and had dreamt of Aiwendil. We now know that he is not the True Seer and I'd like him to re-evaluate his case against Aiwendil today; see if he attacks or retreats.
But why has nothing come of the Farael controversy? As soon as LMP makes his case against Boromir people attack on both sides; as soon as Mormegil attacks LMP many many words are exchanged and suspicion is thrown on all sides. What's so different about this case?
Because if a wolf can simply attack someone particulary strongly — by posting convincingly that so-and-so is a wolf — and that's all he/she has to do in order to be labelled 'Too bold to be a wolf', then he/she's going to get an easy ride.
I could be way off here; but it's something that struck me as I read the entire thread again. There seems to be a discrepancy here. Please share your thoughts.
Edit to add: Farael has just posted but I didn't see it.